RESPA – Page 3 – Consumer Financial Services Watch

Supreme Court’s No Decision is a Decision in First American v. Edwards

Jun 29 2012

Must a consumer suffer actual harm to sue the settlement service providers involved in his or her real estate mortgage transaction for engaging in activities that violate the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), or is the mere allegation of a statutory violation sufficient to get the consumer into court? The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in First American v. Edwards not to consider the standing issue under RESPA leaves the settlement service industry at the mercy of the lower courts and effectively invites private plaintiffs to sue settlement service providers under RESPA whenever a statutory violation is suspected regardless of whether any harm has resulted. Read More

U.S. Supreme Court Ends the RESPA Section 8(b) Debate: It Takes Two to Tango

May 25 2012

By: Holly Spencer Bunting, Phillip L. Schulman

The split in the federal Circuit Courts over the interpretation of Section 8(b) of RESPA has been resolved, and the result is that it takes two to tango for a Section 8(b) violation. In a decision made on May 24, 2012 in Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that a charge for settlement services must be divided between two or more persons to constitute a violation of Section 8(b). This is welcome news for settlement service providers, who can rest assured that their own prices, whether as part of a mark-up of a third-party fee or their own unilateral charges, cannot violate Section 8(b) of RESPA. Read More

CFPB Plans Small Business Review Panel for Combined RESPA and TILA Disclosures and Hints at Possible Regulatory Changes

Mar 05 2012

By: Holly Spencer Bunting

If you are on the edge of your seat waiting for the combined RESPA/TILA proposed regulations and disclosure forms, we have our first glimpse into the changes being contemplated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB” or “Bureau”). On February 21, 2012, the CFPB announced its plan, in accordance with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, to solicit feedback from a group of small business mortgage and settlement companies that will be directly impacted by new and combined RESPA and TILA disclosure forms. In addition to describing the purpose and process for a Small Business Review Panel (“Panel”), and publishing a list of questions and issues for small business representatives to discuss at the upcoming Panel, the Bureau released an outline of the proposals currently under consideration for combined RESPA and TILA regulations. At this point, the outline is a list of issues that will allow the CFPB to measure whether the regulations under development could have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, but it gives us a first glance at the changes that could be coming for mortgage disclosures under RESPA and TILA. Read More

Freeman v. Quicken Loans to Decide Whether Undivided Unearned Fees Violate RESPA

Feb 24 2012

By: Phillip L. Schulman

To split an unearned fee or not to split an unearned fee in order to violate the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) – that is the question. Rather, that was the question on February 21, 2012 when the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc. The case is intended to settle a dispute among the federal circuit courts regarding the statutory interpretation of Section 8(b) of RESPA which prohibits giving or accepting “any portion, split, or percentage” of any charge for settlement services “other than for services actually performed.” Read More

CFPB Republishes RESPA Regulations

Dec 20 2011

By: Holly Spencer Bunting

While the CFPB took over rulemaking and enforcement authority for RESPA on July 21, 2011, that transfer of authority will soon be reflected in RESPA regulations. On December 20, 2011, the CFPB published an interim final rule in the Federal Register to republish, effective December 30, 2011, HUD’s Regulation X, which implements RESPA. These republished regulations are substantively the same as the current RESPA regulations, but the CFPB makes certain non-substantive, technical, formatting, and stylistic changes to the regulations. The CFPB will accept public comments on the interim final rule until February 21, 2012. Read More

RESPA Investigations Initiated at HUD May Have Been Reassigned to the CFPB

Dec 19 2011

By: Phillip L. Schulman

When HUD transferred RESPA enforcement authority to the CFPB, some RESPA investigations that had been initiated at HUD may have been assigned to the new agency. As a result, some companies may not be out of the woods just yet.

Approximately 10 former HUD RESPA Enforcement Division staffers and counsel transferred to the new CFPB on July 21st, including RESPA Enforcement Division Director Bart Shapiro. About five of those employees ended up being reassigned to the CFPB’s Enforcement Division. Last spring the HUD Unit was busy trying to resolve dozens of RESPA investigations before they turned out the RESPA enforcement lights at HUD. Read More

Tag:RESPA