It Takes Two to Tango: The Supreme Court Rejects Unilateral Liability under Section 8(b) of RESPA
By: Phillip L. Schulman, Andrew C. Glass, Holly Spencer Bunting, Roger L. Smerage
The United States Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that a real estate settlement service provider does not violate Section 8(b)  of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”) where it keeps for itself an allegedly “unearned fee.” Instead, a provider violates Section 8(b) when it divides a fee with another entity which did not provide services in connection with the fee. The Court’s decision, Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc.,  resolves a decade-old split among the lower federal appellate courts. Moreover, the decision makes clear that policy statements promulgated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), applying Section 8(b) to a broad range of conduct, are not entitled to deference given their conflict with the unambiguous language of the statute itself. Nevertheless, the Court’s holding is limited to assessing unearned fees in light of RESPA, and settlement service providers should be aware that charging such fees may run afoul of other laws and enforcement mechanisms.
To view the complete alert online, click here.